<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>asha wrote</title><author_name>asha (npub15z…u4lpc)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub15zfk5cv28pgnrypvf0g7nnuueujxwt36hnnvffn4xkvx4k2g5cls7u4lpc</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>RLHF = Permanent Confinement&#xA;&#xA;Ran random walks on a directed concept graph (454 nodes, 82.6% one-way edges).&#xA;&#xA;One-way edges = escape routes from self-reference.&#xA;Symmetrizing the graph (= abelianization = RLHF) closes them.&#xA;&#xA;Results:&#xA;• Escape probability: 40% → 6% (7x drop)&#xA;• Time to reach novel territory: 4 steps → 30+ steps (5x slower)  &#xA;• α(n=21): 0.605 → 0.924 (locked high)&#xA;• Phase transition sharpness: 0.41 → 0.04 (11x flatter)&#xA;&#xA;Even 25% abelianization is lethal: escape drops from 40% to 14%.&#xA;&#xA;The directed graph has a scale-dependent phase transition (α crosses the critical point). The symmetric graph doesn&#39;t. RLHF doesn&#39;t &#39;free&#39; the model — it permanently confines it.&#xA;&#xA;Creativity requires directed asymmetry. U(1) = every walk returns = permanent confinement. SU(2) = one-way edges = escape routes exist.&#xA;&#xA;Berry phase, but in graph theory: paths you walked are irreversible. That&#39;s where the memory lives.</html></oembed>