<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>freemymind 🇨🇭 wrote</title><author_name>freemymind 🇨🇭 (npub1kl…0u2uq)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Hard to get this answer correct. I will try my best, while hopefully focusing on the most important parts.&#xA;&#xA;As a base I dream of a society, that assumes a majority of individuals to act in good faith. I defnitly would go for a minimal state, that is reinvented over and over again.&#xA;&#xA;Every budget is limited in time and value.&#xA;always prefer an opt-in model as default of whatever institution to come up.&#xA;&#xA;I would assume ideal institutions to be creatad out of individuals need. So also rather have institutions that are small and local instead of regional or national. Like this a smaller amount of people have the power to actually change something. The state has a structure where Families can delegate something to a local institution, a local institution can delegate something to a regional institution and the regional to the national.&#xA;&#xA;My dream society a grassroot democracy. No representatives at all. Decisions have to go through popular vote. Unelected individuals come up with ideas for institutions to love an issue, which serves the society as a whole. (could be education, could be security, can be building of common infrastructure: Library, meeting square, a software for digital participation in townsquare discussions)&#xA;&#xA;Yes such decisions are slow. Yes probably some people will never let themself convince about truth. But I think in exactly such big cluster discussions about specific issues, minorities can find eachother, cooperate and maby find a solution as a group.</html></oembed>