<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>freemymind 🇨🇭 wrote</title><author_name>freemymind 🇨🇭 (npub1kl…0u2uq)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>&#34;a minority of key institutional claims are Verified, but many high-impact claims are Unverified&#34;&#xA;&#xA;(https://www.ukfactcheck.com/fact-checker/132/rape-gang-inquiry-report-docx)&#xA;&#xA;Other parts of this factcheck: &#xA;Unverified claims&#xA;&#xA;&#34;That ‘around 87% of those convicted in these group-based CSE cases bore distinctively Muslim names’ as a reliably derived statistic across ‘court records and official inquiries’ (name-based inference is methodologically disputed and not confirmed here from primary datasets).&#34;&#xA;&#xA;&#34;That ‘Labour MPs voted en masse against a Conservative amendment’ with the exact tally ‘364 to 111’ on a national statutory inquiry amendment in ‘January 2025’ (no primary parliamentary division record was retrieved in this run).&#34;&#xA;&#xA;This report is probably mostly a PR-stunt from Reform-UK. Too many stuff is simply not proofen.</html></oembed>