<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Globe99 wrote</title><author_name>Globe99 (npub147…paq44)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub147fp2j606qpfysp38phhzvempt7ewsdqwm6uww9uycp6tdvavu0s5paq44</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Hehe &#34;a few years&#34; = the entire history of this protocol, so your opinion is as valid as mine bub. 😄&#xA;&#xA;But still, I have to say it&#39;s the &#34;other stuff&#34; in &#34;Notes and other stuff&#34; to which I&#39;m referring. The &#34;twitter-like&#34; part of Nostr, I.e. kind 1, is really only scratching the surface. You extend out from that to Longforms, which could in principle replace Substack/Medium, Reddit- or Discord- type private forums (don&#39;t know Kind # but that&#39;s out there).&#xA;&#xA;The &#34;twitter&#34; part is simply the most developed, but I don&#39;t see anything awkward or &#34;bolted on&#34; about the other stuff... Would be a different story perhaps if we were talking about ATProto....&#xA;&#xA;If anything can be said to be &#34;optimized&#34; about Nostr, IMHO it isn&#39;t the &#34;public consumption&#34; but rather the relay redundancy. Where this perhaps loses to other models is in the requirement for low-latency, I.e. voice or video, but that&#39;s not necessarily important for &#34;dissident communication.&#34;</html></oembed>