<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>VitorPamplona wrote</title><author_name>VitorPamplona (npub1gc…fnj5z)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>What scares me in Brazil&#39;s X ban is how overly broad the wording in the judge&#39;s decision is: &#xA;&#xA;&#34;Internet providers, on behalf of their presidents (makes it personal legal liability), must add technological obstacles (literally anything) capable of making the use of X unfeasible.&#34; &#xA;&#xA;It&#39;s not about blocking IPs or domains. It doesn&#39;t prescribe any specifics. It names companies that must comply, but only as examples. And it seems to strip corporate protections and goes straight into personal liability. All in just a few sentences.&#xA;&#xA;Too broad. No one should have this much power. </html></oembed>