<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>vipier wrote</title><author_name>vipier (npub156…39ymv)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1568ww9d0k6yyte4lh7fqtvh96amz4l7706d7lf8g26htt2w4a8eqh39ymv</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Yes, lending bitcoin will be disincentivized because since there&#39;s no supply of new bitcoin, eventual defaults are mathematically assured.&#xA;&#xA;Instead of lending rates, perhaps there will be fluctuating rates of equity-for-capital. That is, the purchasing power of bitcoin will increase with greater general productivity growth, and will decrease with lower productivity growth. As a bitcoin holder, if general productivity growth is slow or negative, you&#39;d be incentivized to accept less equity in a business per unit of bitcoin buy-in. If productivity is growing quickly, you&#39;d demand more business equity in exchange for your fast-deflating bitcoin capital.&#xA;&#xA;Makes intuitive sense: if there isn&#39;t much innovation or population growth happening, then it will become cheaper to get capital in exchange for equity. A naturally competitive dynamic.</html></oembed>