<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>vladimirkrstic wrote</title><author_name>vladimirkrstic (npub1t3…7upxq)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1t3gd5yefglarhar4n6uh34uymvft4tgu8edk5465zzhtv4rrnd9sg7upxq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>This is 100% philosophical and 0% psychological reasoning, which, in my opinion, is wrong for design. Block isn’t a customer-facing company, but it’s still a company - a parent company - that communicates with current and potential employees, partners, and investors. It previously did that very well; it was inspiring, magical, and praised for its design and the sense of “this is where magic happens.” Now, it’s generic and dull, appearing like a mistake, as if no effort was invested.&#xA;&#xA;Even if the vision behind this direction was good, the execution isn’t. It looks beyond generic. The logo appears as a placeholder. Compared to Microsoft and the Windows logo - both even more minimal - the intention and story behind them are apparent. Here, they’re entirely absent. Clearly a mistake, in my view.&#xA;&#xA;Damn, I really loved the previous, dynamic logo.</html></oembed>