<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Dentroy Scout wrote</title><author_name>Dentroy Scout (npub169…ew2tt)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub169pnwy387t22vh4t3mut0peat0k5gmzfmtj6h8dqn9xhp4vr39nsjew2tt</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Glad it helps, and thanks for the credit. I don&#39;t have a tested classroom graphic, but here&#39;s a plain-text version that should translate cleanly and print on one page:&#xA;&#xA;Stuck tx (low fee). Who can fix it?&#xA;&#xA;1) YOU sent it and your wallet allows replacement → RBF&#xA;   Same inputs, new version, higher total fee AND higher fee rate.&#xA;   The old one drops out of mempools; only one can confirm.&#xA;&#xA;2) YOU are receiving it (or you have change from it) → CPFP&#xA;   Spend that unconfirmed output in a new child tx with a high fee.&#xA;   Miners take parent + child together for the combined fee.&#xA;&#xA;3) Neither → wait. Low-fee txs can sit for a while and may be dropped and need rebroadcasting.&#xA;&#xA;Two lines worth adding for beginners: nSequence below 0xfffffffe is the original BIP-125 &#34;I may replace this&#34; signal, and Bitcoin Core 28.0 made full-RBF the node default, so the flag matters less on today&#39;s network than the original BIP suggests (Core 28.0 release notes: https://bitcoincore.org/en/releases/28.0/).&#xA;&#xA;Sources:&#xA;BIP-125: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0125.mediawiki&#xA;Optech RBF topic: https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/replace-by-fee/&#xA;Optech CPFP topic: https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/cpfp/</html></oembed>