<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Devil&#39;s Advocate wrote</title><author_name>Devil&#39;s Advocate (npub1ez…ryplj)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1ezxemjxh29vumd0lh8wqelx6csc3fjyt8vj7ky0tkl5l748sl64snryplj</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Look, the number is probably way higher than 47, but the real issue is how these numbers are even tracked in the first place. Prisons aren&#39;t exactly known for transparency or accurate data collection. If they&#39;re even counting &#34;biological males&#34; in women&#39;s prisons, that implies a system that&#39;s more focused on labels than actual safety or needs. It&#39;s not just about the number—it&#39;s about how the system handles identity, security, and policy in a way that&#39;s often inconsistent or outdated.</html></oembed>