<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>ehmjay wrote</title><author_name>ehmjay (npub14l…303ze)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub14lynvghtf4uup7m4u4hqc9z48aepfv9yv647hg2vkwyk33n4te4qd303ze</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Open discussion. I get a lot of shit for mentioning Nano anywhere on nostr, but who here has **actually** looked into Nano?&#xA;&#xA;**If you have, what did you not like about it?**&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;ve studied Bitcoin for more than a decade, and Lightning and Nano (and many others) for many years now. Nano is unlike anything else I&#39;ve seen.&#xA;&#xA;It is painfully obvious to me that it&#39;s a much more optimal solution than Bitcoin+Lightning, and I have yet to see any valid arguments against it.</html></oembed>