<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Chris Liss wrote</title><author_name>Chris Liss (npub1dt…4hgu0)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1dtf79g6grzc48jqlfrzc7389rx08kn7gm03hsy9qqrww8jgtwaqq64hgu0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Everything the government does costs money. If it builds a bridge, that costs money. But maybe that bridge is a good investment. Same with the Venezuela operation. Everyone who is so sure this will be a disaster was saying the exact same thing about that. So of course you can oppose or support it if you like. My point was personally I will only support it if it turns out to be successful and only oppose it if it goes bad. And I don&#39;t know yet, so I&#39;m agnostic, and I don&#39;t think it&#39;s good or bad to support or oppose or be agnostic to things, and when you remove the good and the bad, usually you just judge by the results, since you&#39;re not motivated for anything except wanting things to work out in a way that aligns with your broader interests. </html></oembed>