<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>FernandoTheKoala wrote</title><author_name>FernandoTheKoala (npub1uy…zn9k0)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1uy6fplfrgddrex6ndcvwsvy7nlv4gadlw2j80vgkduk5ceg69e3sgzn9k0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I like you man but I don&#39;t like this post because: &#xA;&#xA;1) there is no evidence here, there is a big assumption on your part that is not possible that so many knots nodes have popped up (which has been proven wrong by the start9 X post). They have man and it&#39;s not hard to believe, lot&#39;s of ppl really did not like this change and got off their asses to run a knots node  &#xA;&#xA;2) this post seems like an attempt to make the &#34;knots sentiment&#34; look smaller than what it actually is. Why? To me sounds something like &#34;no but look, it is not true that 20% of the network disagrees, it actually is just 12%).  I don&#39;t see any good reason to recur to this &#xA;&#xA;On the other hand, to show you I try to stay as objective as possible, I don&#39;t like the fact that knots people have come up with the csam narrative only 3 days ago (why only now, and not mention it at the very beginning of all this debate in May?). Instinctively sounds like a way to &#34;play some last dirty card&#34; to apply as much pressure as possible in this last month before core 30 is shipped&#xA;&#xA;peace and love </html></oembed>