<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Daniel Wigton wrote</title><author_name>Daniel Wigton (npub1w4…q30zp)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1w4jkwspqn9svwnlrw0nfg0u2yx4cj6yfmp53ya4xp7r24k7gly4qaq30zp</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I will co-sign. I don&#39;t particularly care what kind of government we have as long as people are generally free to live good lives. In the end I would boil the function of government down to creating a stable environment for families. &#xA;&#xA;If you need more levels because of size then the next level up should be restricted to creating a stable environment for the level below it, but not interfere with levels below that.&#xA;&#xA;It would certainly make things simpler here in MN. Right or wrong, if MN wants to support immigrant families, then they shouldn&#39;t have to contend with a federal police force swooping in and taking people off the streets and out of homes.&#xA;&#xA;The federal gov should regulate states, not the people in them.&#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t neven think states should be involved directly with people, that should beling to the smallest local level that can actually get to know them personally.</html></oembed>