<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>edilmedeiros wrote</title><author_name>edilmedeiros (npub1uu…3hr2k)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1uu8sdgm7geznwnaxhfgqs5wp6slhpm8tsdy6u852v72jawyk0faqc3hr2k</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I&#39;m more inclined to say that Part 3 is the most important (transaction semantics) for other protocols development and that&#39;s what&#39;s on my mind right now.&#xA;&#xA;Part 5 would be the foundation of consensus. Thinking out loud, maybe I&#39;m taking consensus for granted during the previous parts. &#xA;&#xA;In the overview of Part 1, I plan to explain all the mechanics, including distributed consensus, but without going into the details. Indeed, I feel it didn&#39;t work well last year. Maybe I should consider a lecture dedicated to consensus.&#xA;&#xA;Thanks. </html></oembed>