<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>lane wrote</title><author_name>lane (npub1qt…ndc09)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1qtcghtewuqjnkxcjtu8y6saz5s876cwqwwxfyf2vrpaesd3dvfcqfndc09</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I have a few problems with this line of thinking:&#xA;&#xA;a. it&#39;s not lower supply.  it&#39;s a lower *inflation* (or if you prefer, supply *issuance*) rate&#xA;&#xA;b. assuming that&#39;s what you meant, this still ignores the basic math of how much the supply issuance impacts price.  see my meme above :)</html></oembed>