rich1.0Gary ₿usey (npub10v…5y2c7)https://yabu.me/npub10vkh8gavju2tqegqqp29fvdjfle92vzwkjyqw6pzzgssr58u773qn5y2c7njumphttps://yabu.meI agree with you on certain elements of this statement. When you wonder if AI will surpass humans strictly in terms of "smarts", as you mentioned, yes it will exceed humanity very easily. But, I can't fully agree with you're notion that we'll most likely not see a generalist AI. I believe it will eventually be able to but through different means of achieving consensus. Humans have a tendency to generalize through whatever degree of emotional impact different types of experiences may have on them. This is why when humans generalize they often have a tendency to be wrong about many things; much of the time it lacks logic. Not always. But, often. Given an AI's lack of emotion, there seems to be, at least, a small possibility of it being able to generate a consensus through facts alone. Including statistical facts that were produced through the observation of emotional responses.