rich1.0nobody (npub1an…l8jd4)https://yabu.me/npub1andyx2xqhwffeg595snk9a8ll43j6dvw5jzpljm5yjm3qync7peqzl8jd4njumphttps://yabu.meIn Bitcoin, there's no neutral arbiter - credibility is the filter. "Technical facts" don't select themselves. Lopp framed unlimited OP_RETURN as "neutral" (Point 8) while ignoring it breaks 10 years of policy and leaves CVE-2023-50428 unpatched. Why? Because 83 bytes kills his investment; 100KB saves it. You can't separate the "what" from the "who" when the "who" decides which facts get spotlighted. That's not ad hominem - it's due diligence.