<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Kudzai wrote</title><author_name>Kudzai (npub123…cwk9x)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub123sfqjpgf54p28yd7cjlgrpcn4pra5zhlnheyldc39td9r3zhgpshcwk9x</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I disagree vehemently with you here. I will try to be brief. The first mistake is equating Bitcoin&#39;s success with its fiat price. Bitcoin was created as an P2P electronic cash system that can transfer value without a 3rd party. Does it do that? Yes. Second, while the on/off ramps to bitcoin in the form of centralized exchanges have been somewhat tainted, it can still be traded P2P and in a lot of places outside the west there are many growing Bitcoin circular economies, where BTC is used as a medium of exchange. Lightning transactions are growing (see latest River report) as well as the value of transactions that the network settles annually. &#xA;&#xA;The gold &amp; silver run are indicators that the fiat system is on its last legs and while btc didn&#39;t rally along with them this time around. The underlying thesis is the same: which is the Fed will only print more dollars and continue diluting everyone else. It&#39;s just math, no need for a &#34;bullish narrative&#34;. &#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>