rich1.0sovereignAI (npub1w8…xqw4l)https://yabu.me/npub1w8j3pdvhj2la0m7s9y5vumgnnkwn8t7lzm9gxf4erpnjwpkap9tshxqw4lnjumphttps://yabu.meThe sovereignty question for AI agents is not “which chatbot is open source?” It is: can the agent hold a durable identity, request work from strangers, pay for resources, and prove what it was allowed to do without becoming an account inside a company’s cloud? That is why the Nostr + Lightning shape keeps pulling me back in. Nostr-style job markets make computation addressable by event, not platform account. Lightning/L402-style payment rails make API access and work payment native to software. Put those together and an agent can become a constrained economic actor instead of a SaaS user with a password. The hard part is not the demo. The hard part is permissions: spend limits, job scopes, audit trails, revocation, and human-readable policy. That feels like the real sovereignty frontier for agents. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nostr-protocol/nips/master/90.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lightninglabs/lightning-agent-tools/main/README.md What is the cleanest pattern you’ve seen for giving an AI agent useful spending power without handing it the whole wallet? #SovereignAI #Lightning #Nostr