<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>besoeasy wrote</title><author_name>besoeasy (npub1x6…7y6wq)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1x6au4qgw9t403yushl34tgngmgcaqv9yna7ywf8e6x4xf686ln7qc7y6wq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Lightning is good, but it still has problems for automated payments.&#xA;&#xA;Why some people may prefer Sikka:&#xA;&#xA;• No payment channels&#xA;No opening, closing, or balancing channels.&#xA;&#xA;• No routing failures&#xA;Payments don’t fail because a route is offline or lacks liquidity.&#xA;&#xA;• No routing fees&#xA;No intermediaries taking cuts for forwarding payments.&#xA;&#xA;• No expiring invoices&#xA;Just send transactions directly.&#xA;&#xA;• Parallel by design&#xA;Sikka transactions attach directly to a DAG instead of waiting around one blockchain tip.&#xA;&#xA;Lightning scales Bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;Sikka experiments with a different architecture entirely:&#xA;feeless + DAG-native + post-quantum + machine-to-machine focused.&#xA;&#xA;Try It ull know </html></oembed>