<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>nodesy wrote</title><author_name>nodesy (npub1f4…6lpgj)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1f48mtlc2lwxqfekxuql4z2qmvezhd7v9uk7rfga8accs585zrars56lpgj</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>debating switching tagstrs back to the non-marketplace, tip-only model. &#xA;&#xA;some downsides with the nft-like market is that lightning is a little cumbersome for larger payments, and relays are slow, sometimes conflicting and reverting. while kind 300XX architecture gets things done, there are moments where transfers might not look right to the buyer. in the long run, if you&#39;re paying a decent chunk of bitcoin for art, you want to know you own it in a robust manner. unlike NFTs, a tagstr can always be kind5&#39;d (deleted) by the artist, that adds another downside for the buyer.&#xA;&#xA;I kind of like the ethos behind my initial approach of zapping any amount on a tagstr to view in your gallery and then if you want it in your trophy case, you up the amount, explicitly knowing you can always lose it to a higher bidder, but can still view it in your collection. the trophy case mechanic is fun, while the collection mechanic offers more exposure for the artist overall. of course the downside is there is probably a cap on what people are willing to tip for what they like compared to what they&#39;re willing to pay for what they own (and can resell).&#xA;&#xA;if I re-do the trophy/case collection approach, I will probably add in a kind1 text field url backup upload, so each note will have an image that is viewable on most clients as well as the compressed, &#34;inscribed&#34; image on the tag, which will be viewable on the site.&#xA;&#xA;#nfts #ordinals #tagstrs #art #artstrs</html></oembed>