<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>fiatjaf wrote</title><author_name>fiatjaf (npub180…jh6w6)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>&gt; A relay is very simple and dumb. It does nothing besides accepting posts from some people and forwarding to others. Relays don&#39;t have to be trusted. Signatures are verified on the client side.&#xA;&#xA;This was probably my worst mistake in describing relays. &#34;Dumb&#34; was never supposed to mean that they were sitting ducks that couldn&#39;t do any kind of filtering. I couldn&#39;t have envisioned everything that relays were going to do in the future, but I thought it was implicit from the rest of the protocol description that they weren&#39;t going to be just free cloud storage providers ready to be abused.&#xA;&#xA;The entire protocol is based on the premise that some relays will censor some people. How can relays be &#34;dumb&#34; (in the sense that some people understand them, as complete inane pipes) and at the same time censor some accounts?&#xA;&#xA;So many misunderstandings could have been prevented with slightly better wording there.&#xA;&#xA;My biggest surprise is how many people liked this idea of a protocol with completely spammed relays and joined us -- but I also wonder how many would have joined that didn&#39;t because they saw in the &#34;dumb&#34; description of relays a protocol fatal flaw.</html></oembed>