<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Duncan Cary Palmer wrote</title><author_name>Duncan Cary Palmer (npub1cx…mexlq)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1cxp3l03x20mkzezzr4takm8w8zuva7xwvacmcewp97z58hjt8xls3mexlq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Hey, nostr:npub1w695k9y6pv0fa5fz4xsljpnk4w5zk83xcmm92zt4dhzdtfl7waqsdz4wwu,&#xA;&#xA;Glad as I am that you agree with my assertions, I&#39;m doubly puzzled by your position.&#xA;&#xA;The bible is *filled* with self-referential claims that it is the very words of God. Jesus himself repeatedly points out that the scriptures testify of and point to him.  God&#39;s words (plural) are forever established in heaven. And so I struggle to understand how you can assert that &#34;The Bible never claims to be the Word of God...&#34;&#xA;&#xA;I also am at a loss to comprehend your epistemology. If you don&#39;t believe the bible to be either God&#39;s word or infallible, what is your basis for knowledge of any kind? I&#39;m honestly wondering. Are you purely a naturalist?&#xA;&#xA;By the way, I&#39;m very appreciative that you&#39;ve read my article(s) (plural) and are interacting, but I wonder about the basis upon which you can be in agreement with me.</html></oembed>