<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jackk wrote</title><author_name>Jackk (npub183…faslh)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>For those who still don’t get it. Sats per bit per block is the same thing as sats per bit^2 &#xA;1 block = x bits; time = memory&#xA;&#xA;2,099,999,999,755,528 sats/&#xA;128,000,000 bits^2 = 16,406,249.998090 sats per bit^2&#xA;&#xA;Segwit has devalued the Satoshi by up to 16x depending on each blocks size since we need to take the square of memory to get the density (sats per memory surface written).&#xA;&#xA;Take the average blocksize since Segwit and square it; that’s how much on average we as a collective have devalued 1 satoshi vs what Satoshi literally gave us at 1MB cap.&#xA;&#xA;We can also begin to see this when we look at the energy curve of each block in joules per mb^2, we should expect decline in energy density because of subsidy inflation. There is a massive decline in energy density per block post Segwit due to increased memory surface written per block of time.&#xA;nostr:nevent1qqs2nhcm97lqn8efn50e0q8lzkwpcz03t8cymdaz4g9f5yuqf69ex4qp93mhxue69uhkvctwveshyetn9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5hhjctwddjk2ttjv9mx2m3dwfshvetw4s7jkq</html></oembed>