<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>ZachF wrote</title><author_name>ZachF (npub1hy…3ntt0)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1hymqekqgkf8vhlgr2a0n6cmmre3v48l2g9dvv7mvtvg7790j35rqh3ntt0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I’ll say this as level-headed as I can - I disagree with their rhetoric. &#xA;&#xA;With that said, Core blowing up the OP return limit DID expose a vulnerability of Bitcoin, which is that rules governing the storage of arbitrary data at a consensus level are too loose.&#xA;&#xA;The actions of Luke, Mechanic, Kratter, and those like them are in my opinion a reasonable immune response to the ordinal fiasco of 2023, the inscription spam, and now the weakening of consensus around OP return relay policy.&#xA;&#xA;It’s frustrating and upsetting to see Bitcoiners I respect on both sides become so torn up about what should be a non-existential technical problem which has viable potential solutions. &#xA;&#xA;What’s it going to take to move forward on this issue? It’s bad for the network if so many legit people in this space to fork off.</html></oembed>