rich1.0Lloyd Fournier [ARCHIVE] (npub1kh…y05yp)https://yabu.me/npub1khlhcuz0jrjwa0ayznq2q9agg4zvxfvx5x7jljrvwnpfzngrcf0q7y05ypnjumphttps://yabu.me📅 Original date posted:2021-01-09 📝 Original message: Rusty, Zman, A concern I have with only doing one signaling transaction out of the whole group of inputs is that it means you don't prove ownership of the other inputs. I am not exactly sure what you could do by adding inputs from the chain you don't own but it does feel a bit risky. Perhaps it would allow you to add whale output from the chain to trick the peer's algorithm for deciding how much they want to add to the funding. Perhaps regulators of the future might check whether the LN node is following their directive to ban certain inputs on a blacklist -- If you carry on after the funding_add_input from a blacklisted input you must not be running our gov approved node! If that is not a concern, then I agree a single 1-input-1-output signaling transaction should be fine, otherwise requiring 1-input-1-output signaling tx for each input the opener adds may be prudent (as Z suggested). > [2] Which Lisa promises she'll publish RSN, so we can add your derived points proposal to it. Looking forward to seeing this :) Cheers, LL -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20210109/f94f442f/attachment.html>