<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>BaronBurdock wrote</title><author_name>BaronBurdock (npub1u6…sq7z8)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1u6j0u5aakylx0qp2wl8g0rmvfhhlp4vdl8f3g23n8wfqgx4faw5qvsq7z8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I guess I&#39;m still not following why Core decided to do this. Why open up this battle right now, was anyone actually asking for this? This just seems like a tactical error on Core&#39;s part, or theres something that they are trying to distract us from like covenants or something. &#xA;&#xA;I don&#39;t see the upside for them, and it seems like the end result is more implementations of Bitcoin will get support - which I&#39;m okay with, because if the others get some traction I would think they would all need to be somewhat in agreement on the big things or risk a fork. MAD for changes to Bitcoin.</html></oembed>