<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>buckyfonds wrote</title><author_name>buckyfonds (npub1x9…p6rta)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rta</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Very unlikely that Bitcoin ETFs could have been stopped with this design (no privacy by default and not fungible).&#xA;&#xA;To make ETFs less appealing, you&#39;d have to have a hostile to the state design (more Monero-like).&#xA;&#xA;It is less likely they&#39;d want to promote you and push you into the mainstream if you are private and fungible by default, and the community is straight up hostile to the state.&#xA;&#xA;Bitcoin is safe for the state, that&#39;s why it got mainstreamed.</html></oembed>