rich1.0Super Testnet (npub1yx…c399s)https://yabu.me/npub1yxp7j36cfqws7yj0hkfu2mx25308u4zua6ud22zglxp98ayhh96s8c399snjumphttps://yabu.meThose paragraphs precisely identify three of the four steps of a timing analysis trace and imply the other: (1) the target acquired amount K of XMR on exchange A (2) he withdrew amount K of XMR from exchange A (this is the one they imply) (3) he sent amount K of XMR to exchange B (4) he did this all within the span of a few minutes Describing a timing analysis trace is supporting evidence that they did a trace of monero. They did a similar trace 4 times in each of the subparagraphs I cited. > your assetion that they identified him *through* any activity like that is another straight up lie They did the trace for a precise reason: without that evidence, they only *suspected* the target laundered the money. In order to *identify* him as the perpetrator, they needed to do the trace that linked the criminal proceeds to a monero wallet and then do a further trace to link that monero wallet to his KYC'd identity (and they did that part by tracing it to a CEX that had his identity documents)