<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>brito wrote</title><author_name>brito (npub1hf…p7yfm)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1hfg3tsmmp7g3u5cw6mzg0n9andehmgel6jug486eppsr0rqx4a3qlp7yfm</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>It isn&#39;t a conclusion, it is a comparison.&#xA;&#xA;Signal is not the best mainstream option, because it was never really adopted by mainstream despite being promoted by western governments and left-wing groups, lest not forget it appears plenty even on holywood movies.&#xA;&#xA;Still, Telegram has defacto been the best mainstream option without any of that. It is the non-acceptable option by western governments and yet used so often by the &#34;mainstream&#34; that they had to arrest the founder.&#xA;&#xA;SimpleX is similar garbage to both signal and telegram. There is ZERO benefit in repeating the same mistakes of the past. SimpleX is a small russian company, that now received western funding. There is only ONE client implementation and ONE server provided by default by the same company for &#34;free&#34;. In other words, they can easily disable any encryption for the &#34;special&#34; people as done for other options. You can&#39;t really verify and your messages aren&#39;t decrypted at their servers because you can&#39;t even guarantee they haven&#39;t stolen your private keys (tip, they are stored locally).&#xA;&#xA;NOSTR is the future.&#xA;&#xA;Hundreds of relays across the globe run by volunteers, dozen and dozens of client implementations and verifiable battle-proven cryptography that govs have a bad day trying to decrypt.&#xA;&#xA;That is the reason why I&#39;m here.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>