<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Laser wrote</title><author_name>Laser (npub1x4…7armt)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1x458tl7h9xcxa66vr4a8pg0h2qz96pnhwnfpcra0le9090uk5t5qw7armt</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I worked in software for nearly 2 decades, ding dong.&#xA;&#xA;How does the persistence tradeoffs nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr and friends made have anything to do with the debate at hand : whether or not a full stack client undermines #Nostr.&#xA;&#xA;Please explain to the audience how throwing out CAP theorem, a term for navigating data persistence constraints, as it relates to Primal&#39;s cache implementation, supports your presumed argument that the presence of a backend in a client somehow degrades user sovereignty.</html></oembed>