<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>parman_the wrote</title><author_name>parman_the (npub1lt…hk97y)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1ltt9gry09lf2z6396rvzmk2a8wkh3yx5xhgkjzzg5znh62yr53rs0hk97y</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Bitcoin Core will be used as a mule for free, unstoppable CP/CSAM by sickos or state actors, in order to attack Bitcoin and prosecute those who knowingly allow it.&#xA;&#xA;This is the attack...&#xA;&#xA;Once op_return is removed,  plain JPEG images (not part of multiple fragments inside scripts that need to be pieced together and decoded, but plain JPEG/GIF/MP4) will be sent through your Bitcoin HardCore node version 30+, from one paedophile to others, possibly sold (Knots runners won&#39;t touch them, ever). Your Core node will happily pass it along, providing anonymity to the criminals (or state attackers, or Epstein&#39;s old clients). &#xA;&#xA;They will pay a well below market rate initially (eventually zero), and never even need to get the transaction mined - key point. The original filter that Satoshi introduced, FEES, will be effectively bypassed...&#xA;&#xA;After some time, these low-fee CP/CSAM txs will be dropped by Bitcoin Core nodes, but if they don&#39;t, the sicko(s) can do an RBF of the transaction (or if they have chained them, an RBF of a single low-fee unconfirmed parent), to cancel and invalidate the transaction so they don&#39;t have to actually pay for any of the downstream higher fee large transactions.&#xA;&#xA;They will have successfully used your computer to transfer and potentially sell horrible images, without paying (so forget &#34;filters don&#39;t work, they&#39;ll get on chain anyway&#34;), thanks you being complicit, and thanks to all the Core devs who allowed this in. And those gaslighting against us saying this is wrong.&#xA;&#xA;Then public opinion will turn heavily against Bitcoiners, if it isn&#39;t bad enough now. We already know it&#39;s going to get worse as most miss out.&#xA;&#xA;@adam3us has pointed out, incorrectly (I&#39;ll explain), that this attack can&#39;t work, because of some &#34;package relay&#34;. Sounds like this is a filter to stop RBFs of a parent if there is a long chain of transactions dependent on it.&#xA;&#xA;A clever idea, but it can&#39;t work, Adam. Do you know why? Because your resistance itself is a form of FILTER, and FILTERS DON&#39;T WORK, remember? You can not use an argument against us if that same argument is used to defend yourself. &#xA;&#xA;An attacker can get their cancelling RBF transaction mined by going directly to a miner. Then the scumbags get away with using your Bictoin Core node for CP/CSAM transmission - it&#39;s irrelevant whether it gets on a block or not, it doesn&#39;t need to, the paying paedophile got his images.&#xA;&#xA;Ironically, filters not working is the very reason we need filters.&#xA;&#xA;There are 3 solutions.&#xA;&#xA;1) Bitcoin Core reverses this STUPID rushed decision, introducing completely unnecessary risk to Bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;2) We all run Knots, and it becomes the reference client.&#xA;&#xA;3) We move away from Core to Knots, and maybe others will pop up, and there is no reference client, meaning fewer meaningful changes to Bitcoin become likely.&#xA;&#xA;Bitcoin doesn&#39;t need changes; it needs general light maintenance, so just maintain it, don&#39;t change it!&#xA;&#xA;x.com/adam3us/status… &#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>