<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>sandwich wrote</title><author_name>sandwich (npub1ua…q99rx)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1uac67zc9er54ln0kl6e4qp2y6ta3enfcg7ywnayshvlw9r5w6ehsqq99rx</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I think he&#39;s referring to NIP-5D, but not sure if that&#39;s relevant here, as it&#39;s web-based. NIP-5A by nostr:npub1ye5ptcxfyyxl5vjvdjar2ua3f0hynkjzpx552mu5snj3qmx5pzjscpknpr seems more relevant here though. &#xA;&#xA;I will however note I disagree with your assertion. All mobile platforms, and soon native platforms, are bounded by heavy top-down permissions and are gate-kept. Side-loading on mobile is only &#34;allowed&#34; for now, is far from default. PC Operating Systems have been slowly moving away from permissionless installs as well. &#xA;&#xA;Web requires no permission, basically at all. No permission to sign, no permission to use, and no permission to install; and they can be resolved locally and ran in an offline context.  &#xA;&#xA;Native is by far the superior for UX and where the eyeballs are, no competition there.</html></oembed>