<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jameson Lopp wrote</title><author_name>Jameson Lopp (npub17u…wt4tp)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub17u5dneh8qjp43ecfxr6u5e9sjamsmxyuekrg2nlxrrk6nj9rsyrqywt4tp</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Thoughts on Trezor Safe 5 and Ledger Flex:&#xA;&#xA;I like the UX improvements on both devices.&#xA;&#xA;Nice improvements to Trezor&#39;s security model with Safe 3 and Safe 5. The addition of a secure element mitigates the old physical seed extraction vulnerability. Also, the chip in the Safe 5 mitigates glitching attacks and has additional anti-tamper features.&#xA;&#xA;Safe 5 screen is slick and touchscreen + haptic feedback work exactly as I&#39;d expect.&#xA;&#xA;Ledger flex e-ink screen is also nice and I really hope the longevity of it is better than what we saw on Nano S devices with many experiencing screen failure after a few years.&#xA;&#xA;On the complex bitcoin transaction signing performance side, Safe 5 is the fastest Trezor yet and is only exceeded by BitBox02.&#xA;&#xA;Ledger, on the other hand, is looking to have worse signing performance than the Nano S Plus. SAD!&#xA;&#xA;Props to both Ledger and Trezor for shipping new hardware that is compatible with existing APIs and SDKs. As a result, these devices were automatically usable with Casa&#39;s software!</html></oembed>