<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Steve Randy Waldman wrote</title><author_name>Steve Randy Waldman (npub153…zcaex)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub153lsl0t8k7ug7aksd42ykr04h0rqpjfcya9s4d49nahpn6xfj4lq7zcaex</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>If you want to read a limitation in the &#34;tak[ing] Care&#34; clause — a reading the decision does not support, because it grants Trump absolute immunity without suggesting the actions he is accused of fall anywhere near inside the &#34;tak[ing] Care&#34; clause — how in practical terms could you demonstrate that the prosecution was an &#34;unofficial act&#34;, without inquiring into motive? /fin</html></oembed>