<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Steve Randy Waldman wrote</title><author_name>Steve Randy Waldman (npub153…zcaex)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub153lsl0t8k7ug7aksd42ykr04h0rqpjfcya9s4d49nahpn6xfj4lq7zcaex</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>No. Prosecutors never know whether crimes have been committed. They allege, based on lesser or greater evidence. The accused is innocent until proven guilty. Prosecutorial decisions are not restricted to which &#34;crimes that have been committed&#34; to prosecute. You&#39;ve made that up entirely. It&#39;s nowhere in the decision, or my screenshot of it, and it couldn&#39;t be, since there is no certain crime before the prosecution. 1/</html></oembed>