<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Big Barry Bitcoin wrote</title><author_name>Big Barry Bitcoin (npub1pk…tpxa6)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1pktmatjk0l8vn3jhfuwxaasjd65kn4ye9sce3egup7k993f8fg2q5tpxa6</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I&#39;m agnostic to all this, but why do you seem to completely sidestep the point that the bip110 proponents are making?&#xA;&#xA;As far as I understand, it&#39;s not about what you can and can&#39;t do with Bitcoin, but it&#39;s about understanding that it has limited resources and then advocating for its primary purpose. &#xA;&#xA;I think if there weren&#39;t already changes made that effectively promoted Bitcoin as a free-for-all, then you wouldn&#39;t be having this at all.&#xA;&#xA;Either way, I think it&#39;s all noise. I think what core devs released was a mistake and I think what bip 110 guys are doing is another mistake. If we just leave it alone, people will get bored, and bitcoiners will carry on being used as money with a bit of random stuff on the side.</html></oembed>