<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>steepdawn974 wrote</title><author_name>steepdawn974 (npub18w…58w27)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub18w5m3n6cpq4axlhvrpz4kf4mqjj87j5wsddvrrr75s6gvulwzc3s458w27</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Citrea publishes some whitepaper(!), for a bridge that would benefit from relaxed OP_RETURN limits.&#xA;&#xA;Immediately everybody at Core: &#34;yeah let&#39;s DROP the limits - they&#39;re useless anyway. LFG 🚀&#34;&#xA;&#xA;All the while other major changes (e.g. CTV) there&#39;s years of filibuster: Where is your signet implementation? Where is your documented user demand? Where is the documented consensus? etc etc etc&#xA;&#xA;[Ironically, something like CTV would have done away with the interactive presigning ceremonies that particularly hinder 2way pegs such as said Citrea&#39;s bridge]&#xA;&#xA;You see the point why people are confused by how Core is handling that, don&#39;t you???&#xA;&#xA;Besides, blocking dissenting voices from GH for the slightest of disagreements is absolutely disgusting 👎&#xA;This may break the straw for many ppl&#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>