<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>fiatjaf wrote</title><author_name>fiatjaf (npub180…jh6w6)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>One question for nostr:nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7cnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qyd8wumn8ghj7erpwd5zumt0vd4kjmn809hh2tnrdakj7qgcwaehxw309ahx7um5wghxsetvd9hkgetc9e3kvtcprfmhxue69uhhqctfvshxummnw3exjenfv4jzummjvuhsqgynpn80zgmjm5h3vptul320pk7egv6a3dgmfcnnwgmtqr9twx8umyel8dkf  : what is the problem of having a small DHT? If the BitTorrent DHT works super well as you say, why wouldn&#39;t it work if it was exactly the same, but smaller (with just Nostr clients) and done with secp256k1?</html></oembed>