<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title> wrote</title><author_name>npub1u3m2u2ppy4m5h2kkfdf2vu4r7g6hyh2q8cshqhgutctvhn0thvgqz9te33</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1u3m2u2ppy4m5h2kkfdf2vu4r7g6hyh2q8cshqhgutctvhn0thvgqz9te33</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>both sides have valid arguments - the problem is, that in 2026 nobody is &#39;neutral&#39; and everybody is pushing whatever supports their interest. if BIP 110 is not a good solution then on what basis Core has a freedom to implement changes without a debate based purely driven by their own self-interest? &#xA;&#xA;When a very valid issue quickly moves into tribal ad-hominem pissing contests most of the participants lose their hard earned credibility.</html></oembed>