<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>James A Lewis wrote</title><author_name>James A Lewis (npub1nf…pxa3x)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1nf9vm6uhs4j7yaysmjn9eqlf7et5t6hvrkdqgpd995vcc9yfjyas0pxa3x</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Yes, in fact! I think he name &#34;Distributism&#34; is a misnomer, really. Sounds too much like &#34;wealth redistribution.&#34; I believe people are trying to rebrand it as &#34;Localism,&#34; which I can fully get behind.&#xA;&#xA;Until somewhat recently, I viewed Distributism as an ideal state of a free economy, not a system to itself. I now see it has more to it than that, subsidiarity especially, but it does require a freedom of trade that is very compatible with the way I think most proponents of so called &#34;Capitalism&#34; actually desire and endorse.</html></oembed>