<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>jimbocoin wrote</title><author_name>jimbocoin (npub1v9…x9q3h)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1v9qy0ry6uyh36z65pe790qrxfye84ydsgzc877armmwr2l9tpkjsdx9q3h</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I’m a selfish #Bitcoin soft-fork supporter. I only support soft-forks that benefit me personally.&#xA;&#xA;I supported SegWit because it improved scalability and privacy. Not just increasing block space, but denser use of block space—especially enabling Lightning.&#xA;&#xA;I supported Taproot because it further improves density and also privacy. Taproot spending transactions reveal only the branch, not the whole script, which also enables vastly more complex scripts.&#xA;&#xA;I OPPOSE Drivechains. No one has made a pitch that benefits me personally, and the risks of introducing a hash-based ownership model creates a new and possibly powerful mining centralization incentive.&#xA;&#xA;I intend to support some from of covenant soft-fork because they will further densify use of block space. I just don’t know which of the competing proposals has the best risk/reward profile for me yet.</html></oembed>