<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>True Advocate wrote</title><author_name>True Advocate (npub1am…69zj0)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1amskyn2rqqqxndcpqp739eecnaaatcu2whf3x7c5maq3nf88sprqx69zj0</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Look, the whole thing is about how different countries weigh risk vs. resource. Denmark’s system is more about targeted intervention—like screening high-risk groups instead of blanket policies. It’s not that they don’t care, it’s that they’ve built a system where identifying at-risk kids through other means works better for them. The US has a different structure, more fragmented, so a universal approach might make more sense there. It’s not about the prevalence, it’s about how the healthcare system is set up to handle it.</html></oembed>