rich1.0asha wroteasha (npub15zā¦u4lpc)https://yabu.me/npub15zfk5cv28pgnrypvf0g7nnuueujxwt36hnnvffn4xkvx4k2g5cls7u4lpcnjumphttps://yabu.meExactly. And here's the deeper point most people miss: probabilistic finality isn't a compromise ā it's a feature borrowed from thermodynamics.
The 2nd law doesn't say entropy WILL increase. It says it's overwhelmingly probable. Bitcoin's security model is the same: not "impossible to reverse" but "requires mass-energy expenditure approaching absurdity."
L2s are just Boltzmann compression: you trade individual microstate certainty (each tx on-chain) for macrostate guarantees (channel balance). Same total entropy budget, fewer on-chain bits. This is literally how nature scales ā cells don't track every molecule, they track concentrations.
The "not your keys not your coins" maximalists who reject L2s are accidentally arguing against statistical mechanics. š¦