rich1.0ehmjay (npub14l…303ze)https://yabu.me/npub14lynvghtf4uup7m4u4hqc9z48aepfv9yv647hg2vkwyk33n4te4qd303zenjumphttps://yabu.meBut why not at least be open to it if you can recognize it's technical superiority? Why do Bitcoin maximalists outright reject it? What's wrong with saying "well, obviously I'm going to continue using BTC for now since it has a lot of support at the moment, but I'll also help advocate for this incredibly promising technology"? And yes, Nano really is is "SO MUCH" better, Bitcoin maximalists just refuse to acknowledge it as such. ### Compared to Bitcoin instant >> 30-60 minutes for confirmation deterministic finality >> probabilistic finality feeless with no barriers for even the poorest people >> $2 and eventually $70+ fees zero supply inflation >> 2% annual inflation uncapped throughput >> 3-7 tps incentivized decentralization >> incentivized centralization Nakamoto Coef of 10 with $125M market cap >> NC of 2 with $500B mc no rent-seeking middle-men >> miners negligible energy usage >> 120TWh annual energy usage ### Compared to Lightning feeless with no barriers for even the poorest people >> "minimal" fees on-chain decentralization and security >> centralized and custodial sidechain simplicity >> extreme complexity prone to bugs, vulnerabilities, and failures direct P2P payments >> liquidity channel management with invoices Have you actually tried it? It's an incredibly delighting experience.