<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>J wrote</title><author_name>J (npub1mm…aw4rk)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1mmfyr2jdey3yunush3h6wetlk3j4nyxsr92qlfte6gdflsa5r5hsfaw4rk</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>I view these things on a scale from idiosyncrasy to archetype and you can&#39;t necessarily tell what&#39;s correct on your own without investigating, but the idiosyncrasy is closer to illusion/contrivance and the archetype is closer to real.&#xA;&#xA;If you&#39;re thinking of something specific, investigate parallels, especially in pre-modern literature (bc late-stage literature is always operating on too many levels of commentary and tries to subvert the norm) and see what turns up.</html></oembed>