<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>rafftyl wrote</title><author_name>rafftyl (npub1wv…dmy82)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1wvjwqk55d3n20qv06rq2e2qtvra3a90auv340mc6yzrnq0wsrp0qkdmy82</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Although I do not support the fork and don&#39;t think it is possible to eliminate spam, I&#39;m still of the opinion that the BIP&#39;s proponents have a point in pointing out that large, contiguous chunks of data might pose a legal attack vector, as opposed to fragmented data.&#xA;&#xA;It will be hard for node runners to claim plausible deniability if illegal material is embedded in a well-known format (like raw jpeg) in well known locations (OP_RETURN outputs).&#xA;&#xA;I haven&#39;t seen a serious attempt to address this issue (maybe I&#39;m not paying attention) and I don&#39;t think it can be disregarded easily.&#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>