<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>nami wrote</title><author_name>nami (npub1cm…rzwm4)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1cm87c625x3tzqu2qzf7e845749k58u7xvx2gc8ym0wmg9sytwwuqdrzwm4</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Yes, that&#39;s why i said that this is a very good approach, and healthy approach as much as it takes, i add now. Still your company though, not the workers company, aka your benefit. &#xA;About the risks, a worker can even lose his life due to the job. Is there a bigger risk? Risk, in general, is not an excuse for stealing the workers by keeping the surplus. I am telling this, because this is why risk is involved in such conversations, it was invented as an excuse during the cold war as an effort to justify the theft.&#xA;No, it is not possible in many cases and  for many reasons, for a worker to start it&#39;s own business, but yes , on the other hand there are many cases that workers can make their own business or cooperate with others, but they don&#39;t do it usually for the exact same reasons you already mentioned. So, it depends on the case, you can be well right with your criticism on this, i certainly can agree too, but not a general rule. Far from that.</html></oembed>