rich1.0hodlbod (npub1jl…jynqn)https://yabu.me/npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqnnjumphttps://yabu.meThat's sort of my point — everyone has epistemological anchors that they work from. Starting from a position of skepticism doesn't exempt you from the very fallacy you're pointing out. The agnostic's claim of "God has not spoken" is no different than the believer's claim that he has. And an epistemology based on a concrete event like the life of Jesus is far more reliable than one based on an admission of ignorance. Agnosticism has the appearance of wisdom, but never reaches the truth. The question is, what if God spoke in a way you understood? Is there anything that could defeat your skepticism?