<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>w3ird_ wrote</title><author_name>w3ird_ (npub17q…66f2y)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub17q5n2z8naw0xl6vu9lvt560lg33pdpe29k0k09umlfxm3vc4tqrq466f2y</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>admittedly I am not an expert on bitcoin convenants. I know that there are alot of good use-cases for them. that said, how is allowing a utxo to be encumbered, especially in the case of recursive covenants, not a huge attack surface ripe for abuse? it sounds like a great way to make the bitcoin network an ofac-compliant cbdc. </html></oembed>